How did architecture become such a poorly paid profession and what can we do about it?

Matthew Lloyd_resize

The profession must consolidate and specialise to address challenges around low fees and pay, writes Matthew Lloyd

There is much to celebrate about the success of the UK’s architectural industry. All the evidence suggests that the buildings we design today are better than ever. Indeed, our annual awards season, now just commencing, will demonstrate an enormous breadth of quality. In terms of pure architecture, we are most surely on a high.

It is no surprise then that architects’ dissatisfaction nowadays is not about our work. Instead, it is about our pay: ask any architect at an event or party and this is what they will say. Such a constant cry has arisen from systemic low fees, producing a lack of profitability in architectural firms, which in turn leads to low levels of remuneration.

The problem of low pay was described in an impassioned way by Aylin Round in a recent Building Design opinion piece, who despairs of this unhappy economic reality. What is the motivation, she rightly asks, of such a long education and working so hard, if the salaries of young architects are then so low?

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.