- Home
- Intelligence for Architects
- Subscribe
- Jobs
- Events
2024 events calendar Explore now Keep up to date
Find out more
- Programmes
- CPD
- More from navigation items
In his first column for BD, New York-based Chris Fogarty assesses the relative merits of the US and UK planning systems
Recently, I was traveling with an old college friend who owns an architecture firm in London. After finishing a long and frustrating call with a local planning officer regarding a new housing project, he vented that the UK planning process has led to a general lack of respect for the architectural profession. When I mentioned that New York has no formal design review process at all for new buildings, he was blown away. It made me wonder: How did we come to have completely different systems for our city planning, and is one better than the other?
In the UK, the 1947 Town and Planning Act nationalised the right to develop land. Planning authorities oversee local development plans which serve as guidelines and inform decision-making in relation to scale and visual impact. Applications are reviewed by the Planning Officer and approved by a Planning Committee.
…
You are not currently logged in.
Existing Subscriber? LOGIN
REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:
Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from: