Why building on the green belt can’t solve the housing crisis

Alice Roberts CPRE London landscape

Delivering fair access to housing is about so much more than just building more homes, writes Alice Roberts

CPRE London supports house building. But just building new homes will not solve the housing crisis. And building in the green belt is the worst possible option for London: it means losing countryside; creating high-carbon, car-dependent, unhealthy sprawl; it means inner-city regeneration opportunities are missed; and we fail to tackle the housing crisis.

Green belt is land around cities which is protected from development to halt urban sprawl and incentivise regeneration of already built-up areas.

UK developers and politicians, however, say the green belt ‘constraint’ is hampering efforts to tackle the housing crisis. They claim the only way to tackle the crisis is to build new homes. And that there isn’t enough land to build these within our towns and cities. But these claims do not hold up to scrutiny.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.