Handle with care: retrofits are full of surprises and architects have lots to learn

Eleanor Jolliffe

A standard architectural education does not equip us well for working on historic building fabric. You need a clear understanding of how materials work, writes Eleanor Jolliffe

With the increasing urgency surrounding the climate emergency we should all be looking for ways to try and reduce our carbon footprints or mitigate some of the climate impacts of our practice as an architect. The recent controversies surrounding Pilbrow & Partners’ proposals for the M&S flagship store on Oxford Street call to mind other recent debates around replacing older buildings. 

While in some cases the carbon efficiencies of a well detailed and serviced new-build can, in the long term, mean an overall carbon saving over retrofitting an existing building, in the vast majority of cases demolishing an existing building and replacing it will lead to higher carbon costs.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.