Should we test architects’ competence through a) multiple choice or b) another method

Eleanor Jolliffe

For the second of her two-part look at the Future of the Profession, Eleanor Jolliffe takes the RIBA’s pilot health & safety test

In my last column I mentioned in passing the RIBA pilot health and safety test. I’ve now taken it. I am tentatively in favour of competence testing but I hate multiple choice questions with a passion. My brain has an annoying tendency to distrust certainty, so does not respond well to four statements of which two “could” be correct, but only one is. As a result I tend to overthink multiple choice questions and fail them. I did, though, pass this one.

The pilot test is 40 questions in two sections – 20 covering personal site safety, 20 covering design risk management. To pass you need to correctly answer a minimum of 18/20 in each section within two hours. It reminded me of the test for the Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS), which is also multiple choice. The comparison between the two is also helpful as CSCS also seeks to periodically assess basic competence and there is considerable overlap of content. To pass the test for CSCS you need to answer 50 questions in 45 minutes and get 46 correct.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.