Don’t rush to judge. The Grenfell inquiry still has 18 months to run

Crop elizabeth hopkirk copy nj

Studio E has taken the brunt of negative headlines so far, but that is only because the architects were the first to give evidence, writes Elizabeth Hopkirk

You could be forgiven for thinking architecture was on trial at the Grenfell Inquiry after a run of pretty awkward headlines.

Coverage so far has not cast the architects in a great light, with stories such as: “We wouldn’t have won Grenfell refurb in competitive process” and “Architect had not read key fire safety guidance”.

Architects with no connection to the tragedy tell me they are getting a hard time from friends who previously showed little interest in their work, asking if it’s normal for architects to be so unaware.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.