Grenfell Inquiry: Celotex fire safety claims likened to horsemeat scandal

Studio E associate Neil Crawford gives evidence to the Grenfell Inquiry on 9 March 2020

Studio E project lead says insulation manufacturer ‘calculatedly sought to deceive’ with marketing material

Studio E Architects’ project lead for the Grenfell Tower refurbishment said claims made about the insulation product used for the block’s tragic refurbishment were as misleading as those in 2013’s horsemeat scandal.

Neil Crawford, who is not a part III-qualified architect, took over day-to-day responsibility for co-ordinating his practice’s work on the high-rise block in 2014. He told Monday’s hearing of the inquiry into the fatal 2017 fire that the literature he had read on Celotex RS5000 led him to believe it was suitable for use on high-rise buildings.

Studio E did not specify the product’s use as part of the aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding used for the tower’s refurbishment. It had been substituted for a different Celotex product – FR5000 – originally proposed by consultant Max Fordham. In fact, neither product was compliant with Building Regulations.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.